<$BlogRSDURL$>
Prison Pete

Google
 
Thursday, January 06, 2005
  Thoughts on sex, love, and relationships.
I was thinking about the recent CO Mom post you sent me. I am not sure if it is true, and if so, I am not sure if it is something I would actually want. As I have hinted at, I have had more than my share of willing sex partners. Willing because I paid them for it. Plenty of blow jobs in the front seat of my car parked by the waterfront in Brooklyn.

Oh, I would cruise for just the right looking woman. Hey, I even had a few more than one time. I am not at all proud of it now, and I have not shared most of this with anyone before.

So sex, pure and simple, is available and I sort of question the difference between freebies and paid. Emotional, I now say not too different. Lots on the physical, not much on the emotional.

So now having been solo for eight-and-a-half years, I am looking forward to an emotional commitment. Why risk health for fifteen minutes or two hours or whatever.

I am not sure if I have said the following before, but here goes. Love is the key. But what does that mean?

Well, according to my readings, it becomes a question of how far you are willing to go. Can you give 99% in order to get 1% of hot, steamy, emotional sex? My thoughts come from the mismatch on the one hand having my ex willing to do anything, but when she did it, either it was not as good as I thought it would be, and hence she sensed my disappointment and would get pissed or worse, she would just get pissed at doing something she didn't not want to do.

So anyhow, the point I am approaching is if you can get your partner to be as close to 100% turned on as possible, you will have a better time in the long run! But hey, we guys only need five minutes on a good night.

From a male perspective, I was thinking along the lines of coming up with some more sensual (for her), less sexually-specific activities. List activities on index cards and let her pick a card, leave it on your pillow, and that is what you would do. I am thinking that maybe some times you might not even get "release." Make it about her, not you. This seems a lot clearer in my mind.

For example, maybe one night, candles and hot oil massage for her. Another might be washing her hair. This can be a real gift. Perhaps you might even offer to shave her. At one point, that was one way I babied my ex, shaving her pubic hair for several days, maybe once every three days. Use warm water, plenty of sharp razors and have some nice candles and music.

Maybe you could begin to allow her full control one night. You must lie on the bed and not touch! The point is one way to approach this might be to have the cards run the full gamut and allow her to choose. Or maybe set aside some "non-sex-next-time" and make out the cards together.

You might even put some "challenges" or barter system: if you do this or that specific task for her, she will let you pick from three cards of her initial choosing, so she still has some control.

Part of the issue I see in my reading is the "disconnect" we males have that sex is always a separate issue. For a lot of women it seems that on some emotional level they want sex to be part of the continuum of the daily existence. Yes, that may actually mask it, as sex becomes a chore or something you get from her, but the idea is to really try to find out where she is "at" and how you can take steps to move on from there.

I have found that my best self-satisfying moments of late are when I have been thinking of a sensual or romantic scenario on and off throughout the day. Sometimes I wonder if I might be slowing down with age, but given the right stimulation, multiple times a day is still possible. Since I do not get to look much at nudes, and certainly see no moving pictures (i.e. porn), all my stimulation is text or story based.

What I can see clearly now about myself in my past life is that I was always into an Okay-now-let's-have-sex mode. Yeah, sometimes, I would do something romantic, but honestly I would be more likely to not even think of what else is going on in her life.

So the key as I see it is trying to establish the continuum so that sex starts hours or maybe even days before she has to think about the messy part. One step might be surfing the Internet bookstores for erotic or sensual books. Be willing to explore together. How could either of you know what might work if you do not try? I am sort of brainstorming here.

Sex is definitely about power and a willingness to trust, and also to let go. An example of that is how my ex encouraged and almost demanded that I be vocal when I orgasmed! She kept encouraging me with specific instructions, a.k.a. cheerleading. Then afterwards she would give me a recap and score my performance in terms of past orgasms.

It got so that I would really yell, and yes, they were more intense. By comparison it makes my current lifestyle a real downer, since with rare exception one must relieve oneself here in relative quiet.

So assure your partner you are willing to let go, to trust her, to let her see the real you. Do this in a way that initially puts you at risk of looking foolish without embarrassing you.

So just because you think you want "X" at this point, unless she wants "X" too, it will not be as good as it can get. Sex is usually more plentiful when the relationship has few pressures, hence the difference before and after marriage, but if you follow that logic, handling the "problems" together, keeping to a program of resolution, well then maybe that could lead to more sex.

It seems that the best sensual, sexual, erotic times in my life have been when the woman I was with felt they were in control and actively involved and knew they were getting theirs. The women I met post-split from my wife were almost always based on my stated desire to provide oral sex till they cried Uncle! I know I gave at least one woman (with five kids) her first oral sex "O." Up to that point she had used vibrators to reach her peak. So again, be willing to go to the max for her. And the part I sucked at was I thought the sex was enough. But no, they want it all!

And as of now I can honestly see no better way to live life in the future. Yes, my ex was willing to go "places" she never went before, but I continually dropped the ball by not feeding all of her. Women are able to have it all connected. That is the secret weapon. It is not just about a set formula like bringing home flowers, complementing her on her cooking, and then jump in the sack! One must be willing to truly explore what makes someone tick.

Try listening to the call-in sex show on the Oxygen Network. I know it is on at 11:00 PM on Sundays, but I think it is on other times also. You would be surprised at the number of women who call in with what I would call "basic questions." Give a look and see if you get the same response.

Sometimes she might just be indirectly letting you know how "little" she feels. Most people would not think I suffered from low self-esteem when meeting me initially. Some of my computer business clients did see ways to exploit it, but it was my ex who continually tried to make me feel good about ME!

The point on that was I used this as an excuse to not grow into the relationship but preferred instead to run around behind her back. That does not work for either partner in the long run.

I was not sure how this letter would go, but I just reviewed parts of it and I think it is not too bad. I hope you find it at least readable and maybe of some interest.
 
Comments:
Wow.

I've never heard that persepective on sex and relationships from a guy before.

I've been reading you on/off for a while now, although I haven't commented, but sometimes, you can be quite insightful.

Just thought you might like to know.
 
Post a Comment
DIARY OF A PRISONER

View my profile
Contact Prison Pete
Contact the Editor
Blogroll Me!

ARCHIVES
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008

December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006

December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005

December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004

PETE'S BLOGROLL


Powered by Blogger




PETE'S FAVORITES

Authors
Emily Dickinson
Janet Evanovich
Ian Fleming
Jonathan Franzen
Robert Fulghum
Sue Grafton
Tami Hoag
Jean Shepherd

Musicians
Johann Sebastian Bach
Beatles
Beethoven
Virgil Fox
Benny Goodman
Vladimir Horowitz
Itzhak Perlman
David Russell
Lonnie Smith

Radio and TV Shows
All Things Considered
Capitol Steps
Fawlty Towers
Fresh Air
The Infinite Mind
Jazz After Hours
Jeeves and Wooster
Pipe Dreams
symphonyspace.org

Media, Publishers, Networks
Amazon
Augsberg Fortress Press
Hamilton Bookseller
hamiltonbook.com
NY Daily News
NY Newsday
NY Times
NPR
PBS
PC Magazine
WNED Buffalo, NY

Helpful Organizations
Kauffman.org
WKKF.org

Government
Federal Bureau of Prisons
NY State Court of Appeals
NY State Department of Corrections

Other
Typing with a Dvorak keyboard
Fastback Book Binding System
Who links to me?